Not solely has UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson didn’t study from different international locations’ dealings with COVID-19, he has stubbornly refused to study from his personal expertise. He’s the true king of fools. It will be laughable have been it not for the tens of hundreds of deaths he and his authorities are liable for.
Historical past Will Decide Britain’s COVID-19 Response
On March 23, Johnson led England right into a lockdown. It was far too late. In Could, he led the nation out of lockdown in what was purported to be an incremental style. It was far too early. It was additionally complicated, chaotic and solely inspired individuals to desert all pretense lengthy earlier than the ultimate restrictions have been lifted in July and August. Johnson is now again the place he began, declaring, as he did earlier than March 23, that normality and the economic system have to be preserved in any respect prices. As earlier than, an infection charges are on the rise, particularly in London and components of the north. As earlier than, these info are being ignored. In no way will a second lockdown be contemplated, nor will colleges shut after September 1. Responses to any future outbreaks shall be localized and brief time period.
The steerage being handed to England’s hapless colleges is remarkably much like that issued again in January, February and March: wash your palms, clear surfaces and, if doable, preserve your distance from one another. (The federal government provides “if doable” to its paperwork as a result of it is aware of full effectively that such distancing is unimaginable in most faculties and in most school rooms.) As earlier than, lecturers or youngsters who’re clinically susceptible — or who’re shielding a husband or spouse, a mom or father, a daughter or son who’s clinically susceptible — can attend college and may achieve this when the brand new time period begins in early September.
If you’re a mother or father who is decided to maintain your little one at residence, you’ll be fined, as earlier than, by the secretary of state for schooling. And, as earlier than, there shall be no testing until somebody shows signs. There may be, nonetheless, one innovation being launched this time round: youngsters, mother and father and workers who do present any signs are requested to get themselves examined, to hint contacts and to report their findings to the college.
Johnson’s motivation for all this nonsense is the economic system. He’s seemingly and willfully unaware that it tanked by a whopping 20% of GDP within the first quarter, in contrast to simply underneath 12% throughout the EU. This isn’t as a result of Johnson locked down too early and for too lengthy, however as a result of he didn’t lock down early sufficient or for lengthy sufficient and didn’t take that respiratory area to prepare an efficient track-and-trace regime or institute a mask-wearing tradition. He additionally failed to interact with native governments and as a substitute handled them with contempt and withheld from them the knowledge they wanted to guard the susceptible. He has, in different phrases, assiduously ignored the very best methods which might be on public show in China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macao and South Korea. These embody the restriction of motion and bodily distancing, fast identification of constructive and suspected instances by mass testing, and the quick isolation of constructive and suspected instances with applicable remedy rendered.
The pillars of Seoul’s response, for instance, are promptness and transparency, and a willingness to study from the 2015 MERS outbreak. Authorities, native and nationwide, didn’t hesitate: It examined aggressively, launched epidemiological investigations and imposed quarantines, shared info and started disinfection efforts.
South Korea noticed its first confirmed case of COVID-19 on January 23. Inside every week, hand sanitizers and disposable masks have been being distributed without spending a dime on public transport, and seats and handles have been being disinfected. Inside 16 days of the primary case, museums, galleries and different cultural venues, together with taxis, subways and buses, have been being sterilized with ever extra frequency, and individuals who had been uncovered have been quarantined and given specialist medical care. Inside 4 weeks, screening stations have been up and operating across the clock. Dangerous venues similar to bars and cafes have been closed, and remedy was being prolonged to residents with suspected COVID-19 signs. Inside 5 weeks, public amenities have been shut.
Within the UK, inside 5 weeks of the primary confirmed case on January 29, Johnson, on the very best scientific recommendation the nation might muster, had accomplished virtually nothing. The federal government’s modeling group had suggested that isolation and monitoring wouldn’t do a lot apart from delay the height of the epidemic. Life would possibly as effectively go on as regular. Masks weren’t wanted. Extra proactive measures weren’t suggested till six weeks after the primary case. On March 3, Johnson’s authorities, having listened to the good and the nice of Britain’s scientific group, declared that it will be higher if individuals didn’t shake palms. That very same day, Johnson proudly boasted that he had been shaking palms with everybody, together with coronavirus sufferers.
The outcomes are as stark as they’re unsurprising. Whereas the UK has had greater than 60,000 deaths and has taken the worst hit to its GDP yr on yr within the second quarter in 64 years, simply over 300 individuals have died from the virus in South Korea, its economic system grew by the primary quarter and is predicted to handle round -0.8% over the yr. Even within the Philippines, the place the federal government has been equally as irresponsible as Johnson’s, there are those that see the selection between conserving the economic system going and tackling COVID-19 as a wholly fictitious one.
But maybe essentially the most exasperating factor about this complete sorry debacle — certainly the worst exhibition of foolhardiness and incompetence because the 1853 Crimea marketing campaign, the First World Warfare, Chamberlin’s coverage of appeasement or Britain’s chaotic and bloody withdrawal from India (take your choose) — is the truth that Boris Johnson continues to be in Quantity 10. Not so way back, a number of weeks earlier than the outbreak, I heard a younger lecturer, a social psychologist from China, say that the English, so used to being smothered by their authorities and their aristocracy, are most comfy as placid and compliant followers. I’m starting to see what she meant.
The views expressed on this article are the writer’s personal and don’t essentially replicate Honest Observer’s editorial coverage.