News

Is Social Media a Platform for Political Activism or Polarization?

Social media news, social media polarization, social media political debate, US internet use, US internet coverage, online activism, social media and fake news, is social media a force for good, social vs traditional media, online journalism

© Bloomicon / Shutterstock

Based on present estimates, greater than three billion folks worldwide are routine customers of social media. And in case you’re a type of billions, then you realize good and properly that social media is used for way over posting cat movies or wishing blissful birthday to your long-lost faculty roommate.

Now greater than ever, social media is proving to be a highly effective device for each political activism and, virtually inevitably, political debate. However is that this seemingly unending political discourse all the time a superb factor? Is it resulting in a extra politically enlightened and engaged citizenry, or is it merely deepening the ideological divide between us?

Change
within the Political Panorama

Maybe what provides social media its biggest energy, for good or for unwell, is the range of viewpoints it is ready to assist. Because of this social media is uniquely positioned to higher signify the evolving political panorama. In america particularly, the normal two-party political system is proving more and more incapable of reflecting the true political affiliations of the vast majority of Individuals. In 2010, for the primary time in fashionable historical past, extra Individuals self-identified as impartial than as Democrat or Republican.

Conventional political discourse, similar to that discovered within the outdated media of print and broadcast journalism, has but to meet up with the heterogeneous political views of the American citizenry. Social media, then again, appears to offer the proper discussion board for the expression, exploration and, certainly, deeper entrenchment of these various viewpoints.

For all its huge and rising ubiquity, nevertheless, social media and the wide-ranging political views it embraces are nonetheless not all-encompassing. In america alone, an estimated 11% of the inhabitants is residing with out the web, both by necessity or by alternative. Thus, whereas social media can present an illuminating snapshot of the nationwide political panorama, to imagine that the picture is a whole one is to dismiss a big proportion of the inhabitants. That may not solely convey breathtaking surprises on election day, however it could additionally result in egregious, even oppressive, oversight.

In any case, the digital divide is actual, and it’s highly effective. All too typically, it leaves those that would interact within the ongoing political discourse, those that would take part within the political system, behind. This consists of not solely America’s rural communities, but in addition its poor, its marginalized and its disenfranchised.

Is
All Speech Good Speech?

Some of the sacred tenets of American politics is
the peace of mind that speech should be protected, that the salvation of the republic
relies on the sanctity of free speech — and thought. In that gentle, it
would appear that social media can be the belief of the Founding Fathers’
fondest hopes.

In actuality, nevertheless, the safety of free speech doesn’t imply the safety of all speech. There may be some discourse that is just too damaging and too harmful to be uttered in an orderly society.

Sadly, the seemingly limitless dialog on social media and the relative anonymity of the audio system imply that these platforms are much more weak to the abuse of speech than the extra conventional types of political discourse. In any case, it’s far simpler to unfold misinformation, get aggressive and even turn into downright abusive whenever you don’t should look the opposite individual within the eye — or signal your identify. And whereas such passionate discourse could also be meant to win folks’s consideration, encourage them to “share” and, finally, change a couple of folks’s minds, such careless vitriol might simply backfire.

Take, for instance, the spate of feverish protests that have been instigated by the shock election of Donald Trump. Analysts recommend that not solely might these protests accomplish comparatively little on the outset, however that their effectiveness may diminish over time. Certainly, it seems that the extra aggressive and extra frequent acts of protest turn into, the extra readily the vast majority of the inhabitants will start to oppose them. The lure of the social order may very well make the protestors appear to be the enemy.

Such, ultimately, can also be the destiny of inflammatory political debate throughout social media. As we speak’s new media are embroiled in an period of divisiveness, polarization and explosive rhetoric, and are in no small measure accountable for fanning these flames. Nonetheless, it might finally be the cooler heads who emerge on social media to show down the warmth and, eventually, prevail.

The views expressed on this article are the creator’s personal and don’t essentially mirror Honest Observer’s editorial coverage.

Tags
Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Close
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker